Legislature(2005 - 2006)

2005-05-08 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

2005-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 1776
SB 102                                                                                            
The following was read the second time:                                                             
                                                                                                    
    CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 102(FIN) am                                                              
    "An Act repealing the Alaska coastal management program;                                        
    relating to an extension for review and approval of revisions to the                            
    Alaska coastal management program; relating to reviews and                                      
    modifications by the Department of Natural Resources; relating to                               
    coastal resource district policies; providing for an effective date by                          
    amending the effective date of sec. 45, ch. 24, SLA 2003; and                                   
    providing for an effective date."                                                               
                                                                                                    
with the:                                                  Journal Page                             
                                                                                                    
 RES RPT HCS(RES) 2DP 5NR 2AM                                      1700                             
 FN1: (DNR)                                                        1701                             

2005-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 1777
 FN2: ZERO(CED)                                                    1701                             
 FN3: ZERO(DFG)                                                    1701                             
 FN4: ZERO(DEC)                                                    1701                             
 FN5: (DNR)                                                        1701                             
 FIN RPT HCS(RES) 5DP 3NR                                          1759                             
 FN2: ZERO(CED)                                                    1760                             
 FN3: ZERO(DFG)                                                    1760                             
 FN4: ZERO(DEC)                                                    1760                             
 FN5: (DNR)                                                        1760                             
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill:                             
                                                                                                    
    HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 102(RES)                                                    
    (same title)                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                        
                                                                                                    
Amendment No. 1 was not offered.                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Amendment No. 2 was offered  by Representative Kerttula:                                             
                                                                                                    
Page 13, line 18, following "2011":                                                                 
 Insert "."                                                                                         
                                                                                                    
Page 13, line 18, following "2011.", through line 28:                                               
 Delete all material.                                                                               
                                                                                                    
Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that                                      
Amendment No. 2 be adopted.                                                                         
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Representative Samuels objected.                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Representative Samuels placed a call of the House and lifted the call.                              
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?"  The roll                                  
was taken with the following result:                                                                

2005-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 1778
                                                                                                    
HCS CSSB 102(RES)                                                                                   
Second Reading                                                                                      
Amendment No. 2                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  16   NAYS:  23   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  1                                                  
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Elkins, Gara, Gardner,                                   
Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Salmon,                                     
Seaton, Weyhrauch                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Foster, Harris,                                      
Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire,                                          
Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze, Thomas,                                    
Wilson                                                                                              
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Ramras                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted.                                                            
                                                                                                    
Amendment No. 3 was offered  by Representative Kerttula:                                             
                                                                                                    
Page 13, line 18:                                                                                   
 Delete "2011"                                                                                      
 Insert "2020"                                                                                      
                                                                                                    
Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that                                      
Amendment No. 3 be adopted.                                                                         
                                                                                                    
Representative Samuels objected.                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?"  The roll                                  
was taken with the following result:                                                                
                                                                                                    
HCS CSSB 102(RES)                                                                                   
Second Reading                                                                                      
Amendment No. 3                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  16   NAYS:  24   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                  
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gardner, Gatto,                                    
Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Salmon, Seaton,                                    
Weyhrauch, Wilson                                                                                   
                                                                                                    

2005-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 1779
Nays:  Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Harris,                              
Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire,                                          
Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze,                                    
Thomas                                                                                              
                                                                                                    
And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted.                                                            
                                                                                                    
Amendment No. 4 was offered  by Representative Kerttula:                                             
                                                                                                    
Page 12, lines 28 - 29:                                                                             
 Delete "or address any matter regulated by the Department of                                       
Environmental Conservation"                                                                         
                                                                                                    
Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that                                      
Amendment No. 4 be adopted.                                                                         
                                                                                                    
Representative Samuels objected.                                                                    
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?"  The roll                                  
was taken with the following result:                                                                
                                                                                                    
HCS CSSB 102(RES)                                                                                   
Second Reading                                                                                      
Amendment No. 4                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  15   NAYS:  25   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                  
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Elkins, Gara, Gardner,                                   
Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Salmon, Seaton,                                    
Wilson                                                                                              
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Foster, Gatto, Harris,                               
Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire,                                          
Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze,                                    
Thomas, Weyhrauch                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted.                                                            
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS                                   
CSSB 102(RES) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading,                                   
and placed on final passage.                                                                        
                                                                                                    

2005-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 1780
There was objection.                                                                                
                                                                                                    
HCS CSSB 102(RES) will advance to third reading on tomorrow's                                       
calendar.